Realtors Property Resource Licensing Agreement Made Public

On February 23, 2010, in Disclosure, Laugh, NAR, News, RPR, Technology, Websites, video, by Joe Cline

Well, it’s been a long time and I have to admit, that I am surprised super happy that REALTORS Property Resource,LLC has shared the Content License Agreement with NAR’s members. I just read about the revamped RPR agreement on Inman News. Seems to be a pretty long document, but as Brian Larson pointed out, the [...]

Well, it’s been a long time and I have to admit, that I am surprised super happy that REALTORS Property Resource,LLC has shared the Content License Agreement with NAR’s members. I just read about the revamped RPR agreement on Inman News. Seems to be a pretty long document, but as Brian Larson pointed out, the more clear and complete the agreement winds up being, the less trouble there will be down the road. I couldn’t agree more.

Ok, so I’m like a kid on Christmas morning and would love to have more to post now, but I’ve got to grab a glass of wine, sit by the fire (it’s snowing today in Austin), and crank through this baby!

And to RPR, thanks for ruining my funny use of this clip. :-P

It would have been something like, How RPR Responds to questions…

Did NAR just fall in love?

On February 18, 2010, in Investments, Lawsuit, NAR, News, Technology, Websites, by Joe Cline

I’ll be the first to say that technology can be sexy. Especially, when it’s technology that you wished you had. That kind of thinking makes me wonder if NAR didn’t fall in love with the idea of the REALTOR Property Resource and make a mistake by funding it completely alone.
A luxury once tasted, becomes a [...]

NAR makes it rain to the tune of $20MM for the folks at RPR!

NAR makes it rain to the tune of $20MM for the boys at RPR!

I’ll be the first to say that technology can be sexy. Especially, when it’s technology that you wished you had. That kind of thinking makes me wonder if NAR didn’t fall in love with the idea of the REALTOR Property Resource and make a mistake by funding it completely alone.

A luxury once tasted, becomes a necessity. Not sure who coined that, but it’s very true. Use the new iPhone and it’s the next item on the shopping list; buy a GPS and it’s hard to imagine getting around without it. Now put yourself in NAR’s position. There are some awfully talented guys who used to run Cyberhomes. They have been with Fidelity, have been with LPS, and they’re used to selling to REALTORS with sexy looking technology. (LPS is a MLS provider.) Now take these Cyberhomes guys, put them in a room with some REALTORS who run the Association, and the Association’s big fat checkbook and what do you think the outcome will be???

I’m thinking a $20MM company replete with Cyberhomes guys and paid for by Joe and Jane REALTOR. Note that the CEO and a VP are actually brokers, which makes me feel a lot better. Of course, the details are not there for us to see. I mean, sure, there are a few extremely vague agreement drafts floating around there, there are likely some coders integrating data, maybe a few social media evangelists (we met Reggie of RPR in a previous post), and other than that, a whole lot of sealed lips.You can get some great info over at MLS Tesseract if you want to bone up on the current state of RPR. The lack of communication and attempt to get buy in is for some other posts so back to the main thought of this post.

Did NAR fall in love and blow $20 large on RPR? I think they might have.

But why do you think this Joe? Aside from the obvious reasons that we all sell locally (so why do we need a national system) and the fact that the resources they are aggregating are already out there, FOR FREE; Well, I was reading press releases and news stories about the past wonderful experiences that NAR and business partner/related tech companies have had and a few things popped up.

Remember HomeStore.com? Remember the CEO of HomeStore.com who was sentenced to 15 years in a Federal facility for defrauding investors. The outcome, just a little loss of $100 Million dollars to investors and stockholders. No biggie there. I mean it wasn’t Enron and at least NAR wasn’t the sole owner of that baby, who by the way is now called Move.com. Just for your reference that Move stock is now trading at about $1.30 per share down from it’s all time high of something like $102. (Note that Move.com is currently worth less than 70% of LoopNet and less than 50% of CoStar.)

So then I decided to check out what NAR had said about Realtor.com. How was this such a success when HomeStore and Move were disasters less than ideal engagements. Here is what I found interesting that either NAR has forgotten or the fun bunch from Cyberhomes helped them over look. My commentary in blue.

Directly from the Press Release


History of REALTOR.com
In November 1996, the Board of Directors of the National Association of REALTORS® approved an agreement between the REALTORS® Information Network (RIN)—NAR’s wholly-owned subsidiary–and RealSelect, Inc. to take over the operations of NAR’s official Internet site, REALTOR.com. At the time, many business models were considered to finance the development of REALTOR.com.

NAR’s Leadership Team decided against using dues dollars or asking for a special assessment of the membership to fund REALTOR.com. While Homestore and its investors have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to build and operate REALTOR.com, no NAR funds or NAR member dues dollars have ever been used for the creation or operation of the site.

Remember the fraud guy and the hundreds of millions of dollars. Seemed like a good idea then. With the current load of fraud ala Madoff, Standford, and the list continues, it SEEMS LIKE A BETTER IDEA NOW.


Key Provisions in the Operating Agreement
The operating agreement negotiated more than eight years ago contained a number of important provisions ensuring NAR’s control over the content and operations of the site. Those provisions remain in full force today and continue to guide the relationship between NAR and Homestore (NASDAQ: HOMS), which owns RealSelect.

Homestore operates REALTOR.com as a business. Its separation from NAR allows the company to make decisions that could potentially pose difficult problems for a trade association on business terms. These include the pricing of REALTOR.com products and services to REALTORS® and the development and marketing of new products and services.

Ok. Why has this changed? I mean, I love technology as much as the next guy, but if there aren’t private investors out there willing to provide funding then maybe the NAR shouldn’t step in an fund this start up with member dollars. Are any of the NAR board members technology incubator guys? What about venture capital guys with experience in taking a technology startup from soup to nuts??? I’m sure the guys from Cyberhomes are stoked. “Hey check this Bobby, we got an angel investor and get to play start-up now with other people’s money.” Also, since the exact product offerings are not set in stone, nor are any pricing models for members, what’s the deal here? Before owning the whole enchilada posed difficult problems, now, now sweat.

Outlook for the Future
Homestore has survived the shake-out among dot com start-up companies and complete turnover in its management team. It has undergone major cost-cutting and restructuring to adjust to changing business realities. Certainly, its relationship with NAR has helped see it through challenging times and REALTOR.com has never lost its lead in the real estate space.

The two organizations have continued their relationship essentially unchanged because they both benefit. Homestore has access to the best brand in real estate and NAR has a vehicle to provide its members a strong presence on the Internet without incurring the cost or risk of operating REALTOR.com itself. Time and trials have tested the formula, and now it’s poised for new growth, profitability and service to REALTORS®, shareholders and consumers alike.


Um. yeah. If I hadn’t sworn off the blink tag long ago, the middle sentence above would be blinking like John McCain at a presidential debate. Why has the time tested formula been changed? Remember what happened when Coke tried that??

So now you see why I think NAR fell in love with RPR and wrote a fat $20MM check. The past taught us as an association what works, why it works, and leave it to NAR to forget the history only 10-15 years in the rear view. As a NAR member, it saddens me. As a technology guy, it frightens me.

I’d love to hear from other agents, brokers, MLS folks, even some of those tight-lipped RPR people are welcome here. Maybe if we knew more about what was going on some of the skepticism would melt away. That remains to be seen.

Vaction Home Purchases Dropped

On May 20, 2009, in Austin, Investments, Market Update, NAR, News, Vacation, by Jcline

When someone is looking for a second home, either as a vacation home or an investment property, the motivation and influencing factors are very different than that from a first home buyer. This is more valid in today’s buyers market.
The National Association of Realtors (NAR) released a report that showed vacation home sales dropped a [...]

When someone is looking for a second home, either as a vacation home or an investment property, the motivation and influencing factors are very different than that from a first home buyer. This is more valid in today’s buyers market.

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) released a report that showed vacation home sales dropped a whopping 30 plus percent in 2008. It appears to have parallel reasons compared to the primary residence market. The sales came within the deeply distressed, deeply discounted home market. The median price of a vacation home fell as far down at 150 thousand dollars across the country. Of those who did settle on the second home purchase, the vast majority planned to use the second home for themselves. This means that people are still looking for second homes and are financing them.

Even with the declining numbers, there are significant pluses to this. The housing market is poised for growth again, especially in the Austin area. This also means as people are looking to sell their home, they have two potential markets to target. Growth options continue to be opened, making the housing market more viable.
Now is the time to buy, and sellers are getting more attention.

Is the House Price Nightmare Over?

On May 30, 2008, in Market Update, Mortgage Crisis, Texas, by Jcline

If this report can be believed, things may be looking up for the real estate market in the Dallas-Forth Worth area as house prices continue to creep higher, according to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. The OFHEO reports that Dallas house prices rose 3.76 percent in the first quarter of 2008 when compared [...]

If this report can be believed, things may be looking up for the real estate market in the Dallas-Forth Worth area as house prices continue to creep higher, according to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. The OFHEO reports that Dallas house prices rose 3.76 percent in the first quarter of 2008 when compared to this time last year. Prices rose slightly less than one percent from fourth quarter, 2007. Fort Worth house prices showed a smaller improvement – up 2.59 percent from first quarter 2007 and down very slightly from the last quarter of 2007.

In the rest of the nation, prices continue to decline, down 3.1 percent from 2007.

This doesn’t completely jibe with statistics from the National Association of Realtors, which says the median price of homes in the Dallas-Fort Worth area actually fell over 2 percent in the first quarter this year compared with 2007. And the North Texas Real Estate Information Systems report pre-owned home prices are down 1 percent this first quarter as compared with 2007.

One factor in depressed real estate prices is the substantial inventory of unsold houses in major cities. Inventories are down slightly in the Dallas-Fort Worth region and this should take the pressure off sellers, allowing them to ask a higher price.

All this good news should be taken with a grain of salt, however. The apparently cheery outlook is damped by the fact that this report doesn’t take many factors into account. The OFHEO doesn’t include high-end homes – those priced above $417,000 – and is seasonally adjusted based on information they receive from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae mortgage investors.

So, who to believe? Pop psychology suggests you believe the good news and it may become a self-fulfilling prophecy.