Austin uses single stream recycling.
Austin has earned a reputation as one of the most environmentally conscious cities in the nation, but this reputation has not come without cost. Austin’s current single-stream recycling program, which was instituted in October 2008, has cost the city over $2 million since it began. Single-stream recycling allows consumers to commingle all recyclable materials, including paper, glass, aluminum, and plastic, in one container. It is considered more convenient than recycling methods that require that individuals separate out the different types of recyclables into different bins.
The City of Austin has a contract with Greenstar to separate and accept the recyclable materials. The cost of the contract, however, has far exceeded initial estimates due to a sharp increase in recycling on the part of Austin’s residents. The ease of single-stream recycling is credited in part for this increase; another factor is the heightened awareness of environmental issues on the part of Austin residents. Regardless of the causes, Austin city residents have more than doubled their recycling volume since the implementation of single-stream recycling, and the figures continue to rise each month, creating an unexpected expense for the city and requiring a reevaluation of the recycling contract with Greenstar. The contract is currently under review by the city council to determine if it will be extended beyond its scheduled expiration in 2010 or if the cost of recycling materials can be reduced to a more affordable level by negotiating with the company for a longer-term contract.
Greenstar, based in San Antonio, has offered a number of alternatives that could bring prices down significantly. Austin city officials, however, have suggested a plan that would allow Austin to construct its own single-stream recycling facility and avoid the expense of outsourcing this activity to an outside vendor. Most independent analysts believe that the greatest savings over the long run would be achieved by this plan, which would require only a short-term extension of the Greenstar contract and allow the city of Austin to realize approximately $400,000 in savings over the duration of the extended contract term.
A decision on extending the contract is expected soon; city council members are considering three options, including one that will reduce Greenstar’s processing fees by approximately $20 per ton in return for an extension through 2013. If a new single-stream recycling facility is the chosen option, the resulting construction project is expected to provide employment for a number of commercial builders and environmental consultants who will be hired for the project. By constructing a single-stream recycling plant, Austin can continue to demonstrate its commitment to environmental responsibility and green-friendly living while saving taxpayer money into the bargain.
